Sharing Happens at Facebook, Twitter is Least Engaging Share Platform [Report]

The fact that people are sharing a lot on social networking and microblogging sites is no news now, but what is definitely interesting and noteworthy is the trend in sharing as well as the engagement pattern within different types of share traffic.
A recent report by Share This reveals some statistics on traffic as well as social engagement due to sharing. Here are the key findings of the report:

  • Sharing is increasing, on an aggregate level sharing is now accounting for as much as one-third of the amount of traffic driven by search, which is most often the top source of traffic for sites.
  • Traffic coming through shared links has high engagement value. When compared to search, sites are seeing up to 50 percent more engagement from sharing, i.e., share-originated links are driving up to 50 percent more page views per unique than search
  • As per the report, 46 percent of shares came via e-mail, 33 percent from Facebook, 14 percent from other channels such as Digg, del.icio.us, LinkedIn, etc., & 6 percent from Twitter.
Sharing on social media websites

Sharing on social media websites

  • Though Twitter is still far behind as far as share traffic is concerned but click through rate wise it does score the highest. 40 percent of clicks come from shared articles on Twitter, 35 percent of clicks from email and other social channels, and 25 percent of clicks come from Facebook.

    clickthrough on social media websites

    clickthrough on social media websites

  • Twitter is the least engaging share platform with users visiting an average of 1.66 pages when they click through to a site, while users coming in off e-mail were the most engaged, visiting 2.95 pages, and Facebook trailing closely behind 2.76 page views. These figures vary for sites depending upon their verticals.

Well, the fact that Facebook sends higher share traffic than Twitter is quite understandable as Facebook’s overall population is also far more than Twitter, but e-mail still being the most popular sharing medium is bit surprising.

Also I’m wondering if tiny or masked URLs with constricted explanation are the reasons for high CTR in case of Twitter as against Facebook where a viewer gets to read some summary of the shared link. High engagement quotient of email share traffic is obvious enough; in this age of email bombardment nobody will actually click a link shared in an email unless really interested in that content.

Though this report is based on only 125,000+ sites covered in Share This’s network but nevertheless it does give some insights into sharing patterns of different social platforms. But what would be more interesting is to get deeper understanding of such patterns based on the vertical and content type of the sites along with statistics on type of link being clicked through each medium.

  • Related Articles

    1. Orkut, Facebook as Photo Sharing Sites – Without an Image search app? Why?
    2. Indian Army advises men to avoid sharing employment information on Orkut and Facebook
    3. Facebook’s Twitter-mania (or phobia) – @User tags and Facebook Lite
    4. Twitter Takes Over Facebook in Email Marketing
    5. Indian Government wants to use Facebook and Twitter to reduce Fatal Accidents
  • comment(s) on Sharing Happens at Facebook, Twitter is Least Engaging Share Platform [Report]

    2 Responses to Sharing Happens at Facebook, Twitter is Least Engaging Share Platform [Report]

    1. naman says:

      People share more on FB and email is beacuse more people have FB or email account unlike twitter.
      People who have both FB and twitter account generally share on twitter or both.

    2. Sarika says:

      Facebook and Twitter cater to different niches. –
      Facebook is interactive and more about multiway communication between equals. All parties here are open to speaking to others and also listening to them. Twitter on the other hand does a good job of speaking without having to listen. Quite good for high profile people who everyone wants to listen to, but who can’t possibly listen to so many followers and may choose a different set of people ‘they’ listen to.

      Twitter needs to understand its niche better and become a specialist at it. And Facebook needs to understand its niche and not try to control too much.

      Sarika
      http://www.wooqer.com