Rediff – Adless homepage adds up to the loss [Quarterly Report]

November 7, 2009
By sinha

Rediff Redesign, like we mentioned earlier was one of the most gutsy step by any content player – removing ads from homepage (and even otherwise) isn’t an easy decision – and the impact of removing those intrusive and non-contextual ads has resulted in 16% decline in revenues for quarter ending Sep 30, 2009.

Key numbers for quarter ending September 30th, 2009:

  • Total Revenues – 4.19mn (India: 3.08, US: 1.11).
  • Gross Margin: 66% (as opposed to 75% in Sep’08 qtr)
  • Net Loss (before Income tax): 2.6mn (0.42mn in Sep’08 qtr) – details

Rediff Redesign Impact - Average Page view per Visitor

Rediff Redesign Impact - Average Page view per Visitor

We earlier covered how the non-intrusive experience, combined with a ‘white’ experience has actually resulted in overall increase in pageviews (surprise! surprise!) as well as total visits to the site – signs that show long term value(?).

Rediff’s big bet has been the enablement of social activity on the site – i.e sharing with friends, usage of ‘MyPage’ and ofcourse, the  overall improvement in user experience.

But beyond that, the content/product strategy doesn’t’ seem to have any significant direction. What’s your take? Do you sense a ‘solid’ strategy behind Rediff’s new avatar?

Tags:

One Response to “ Rediff – Adless homepage adds up to the loss [Quarterly Report] ”

  1. anubhav on November 7, 2009 at 2:57 pm

    I strongly disagree by connecting the current revenue downfall to the ‘clean up’ of home page process. Revenues have fallen for most organizations in the web sector, its only that people from other media houses are able to reflect incomes of other verticals such as print/TV into their balance sheets and camouflage the recession effect.

    Rediff has taken a bold step which will profit them in the medium to long term. And to put it in simpler terms, I am using Rediff more than Yahoo these days.

Leave a Reply

By hitting 'Submit' button, you agree to our commenting policy [meant for anonymous cowards]