Internet Ads – What works and what doesn’t [Eye Tracking/Usability Study]

January 14, 2010
By sinha

Usbility guru, Jakob Neilsen along with Kara Pernice has launched his book, Eyetracking Web Usability that has findings from eyetracking studies that they conducted by bouncing infrared beams off a person’s retinas and recording head movements with a camera.

Interesting findings related to Internet Advertising

  • Participants in the study looked at 52% of ads that contained only text,
  • 52% of ads that had images and text separately and
  • 51% of sponsored links on search-engine pages.
  • Ads that imposed text on top of images got less attention
  • People in the study saw 36% of the ads on the pages they visited!
Eyetracking Study Heat Map

Eyetracking Study Heat Map

Findings related to Images on webpages

  • Users are more likely to grant a fixation to an image if they can tell from a peripheral look that they will be able to decipher it.
  • Iconic images do not get looked at if they are diffi cult to make sense of quickly.
  • People are more likely to look at images of an object set against a very simple background than against a crowded one
  • When users select a link to a photo section, they usually expect some value-add in that area, such as larger photos or ways to zoom in.
  • People also look slightly more at images of a single object— 26 percent—than at images with multiple objects—20 percent.
  • People look at unrelated or somewhat related images just 14 percent of the time

Download few pages of the book(pdf) (via)

Tags:

One Response to “ Internet Ads – What works and what doesn’t [Eye Tracking/Usability Study] ”

  1. Bangaloreloka on January 16, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    Have always been ignoring the left side :/

Leave a Reply

By hitting 'Submit' button, you agree to our commenting policy [meant for anonymous cowards]