Let's analyze this from a valuation standpoint, tying valuation to sales of a company.
When an eCom wannabe gets $5 million funding, assume that that company divested 20% equity (minimum) for that money. So its valued at $25 million. Fair enough.
Now, to justify the VC's exit at 3x to 5x (at a minimum), the company would need to have a turnover of at least 3x to 5x of $25 million (assuming a terrible valuation at only 1x Sales). That means a sales of ~ $100 million in the next 3 years.
Thats 500 crores Rs per annum ... selling what ... exotic furniture / ear-rings / men's wallets. Give me a break. This is difficult to achieve, even with a loss leader strategy. And the big daddy that will come from Seattle can only acquire so many of these dot coms.
The joke finale of this funding spillathon was when one very prolific VC who has gone on record saying that eCom in India is overvalued, himself invested a lot of money in a dot-com recently, just in case they missed the wagon. So every other VC's investments were foolish, but theirs was strategic.
What was that dialog in Ishqiya: Tumhaara ishq ishq aur hamara ishq ___ !
Anyways, good luck to the people working hard in these companies, human enterprise is always admiration worthy, though I feel that most have taken on too much funding and are way over-valued.
I have seen dot coms go bust 10 years back in the Valley, have worked in them ... the Indian scenario now doesnt look good.
Sign up using your Facebook or Google id to participate in the forum! Registration takes only 32 seconds!
sinha
449
Sameer
342
saipothuri
203