<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Difference Between Funded and UnFunded Startups: Resource Constraint (aka Creativity Seed)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/</link>
	<description>We Heart Startups!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-165937</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 22:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-165937</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true, resource constraint can limit creativity, but the idea that an investor is the answer might be a false dichotomy.  Investors can also limit creativity.  Even silent partners have an opinion, and as much as they&#039;re supposed to keep quiet, they often don&#039;t.  Many funded companies find their creativity squelched by investors imposed ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true, resource constraint can limit creativity, but the idea that an investor is the answer might be a false dichotomy.  Investors can also limit creativity.  Even silent partners have an opinion, and as much as they&#8217;re supposed to keep quiet, they often don&#8217;t.  Many funded companies find their creativity squelched by investors imposed ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manas Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-81659</link>
		<dc:creator>Manas Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-81659</guid>
		<description>I think some kind of resource constraint always breeds creativity and out-of-the-box thinking. But taken to another extreme, too little money is also pretty bad. Since, too little money also changes the focus and the team starts focusing more on the survival then what they had initially set out to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some kind of resource constraint always breeds creativity and out-of-the-box thinking. But taken to another extreme, too little money is also pretty bad. Since, too little money also changes the focus and the team starts focusing more on the survival then what they had initially set out to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May 2008 roundup - Interesting startups and posts &#124;Technology and Business Startups in India</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-81654</link>
		<dc:creator>May 2008 roundup - Interesting startups and posts &#124;Technology and Business Startups in India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-81654</guid>
		<description>[...] Difference Between Funded and UnFunded Startups: Resource Constraint (aka Creativity Seed) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Difference Between Funded and UnFunded Startups: Resource Constraint (aka Creativity Seed) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nishi/Chillibreeze</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-80923</link>
		<dc:creator>Nishi/Chillibreeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-80923</guid>
		<description>Hey, great post! Actually, it is very tough to categorize things as black and white especially in this area. 

Let us say, a startup receives funding and does all the things mentioned above (hiring a PR agency etc), their success would still ultimately depend on the quality of their product, and not on out of the box thinking. This holds true for an unfunded startup too. So the failure of many funded startups cannot be attributed solely to the lack of innovative thinking.

Of course, there is a big factor that determines whether funding will eventually mean success- How important is brand recognition in their business? And the second question- How important is high traffic to the website? If both factors are important, then PR and marketing becomes more important than out-of-the-box thinking. After all, money makes the mare go and it is very tough to market your brand on a zero dollar budget. For instance, it would be impossible to market a website like Big Adda on a shoestring budget. 

Of course, it is not enough to get eyeballs on the website. If visitors don&#039;t keep coming, the initial investment serves no purpose. It is here that innovative thinking and quality of the product play a big role. And here is where most startups falter after they receive funding- new positions, bureaucracy, red tape and so on. As you have rightly pointed out, innovation and resourcefulness get diluted along the way. 

Before I wrap up, I also wish to add that sometimes, out of the box thinking is overrated. Take the example of Craigslist. They have a concept and they work around it. Not much has changed on Craigslist for a long time and according to some recent interviews, not much will change, as long as the market stays the same. 

I will sum up and say- Whether your startup will benefit from funding or not would depend on your business model. But once you receive funding, success will hinge on effective utilization of resources and future strategy, which does not necessarily have to involve out of the box thinking:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great post! Actually, it is very tough to categorize things as black and white especially in this area. </p>
<p>Let us say, a startup receives funding and does all the things mentioned above (hiring a PR agency etc), their success would still ultimately depend on the quality of their product, and not on out of the box thinking. This holds true for an unfunded startup too. So the failure of many funded startups cannot be attributed solely to the lack of innovative thinking.</p>
<p>Of course, there is a big factor that determines whether funding will eventually mean success- How important is brand recognition in their business? And the second question- How important is high traffic to the website? If both factors are important, then PR and marketing becomes more important than out-of-the-box thinking. After all, money makes the mare go and it is very tough to market your brand on a zero dollar budget. For instance, it would be impossible to market a website like Big Adda on a shoestring budget. </p>
<p>Of course, it is not enough to get eyeballs on the website. If visitors don&#8217;t keep coming, the initial investment serves no purpose. It is here that innovative thinking and quality of the product play a big role. And here is where most startups falter after they receive funding- new positions, bureaucracy, red tape and so on. As you have rightly pointed out, innovation and resourcefulness get diluted along the way. </p>
<p>Before I wrap up, I also wish to add that sometimes, out of the box thinking is overrated. Take the example of Craigslist. They have a concept and they work around it. Not much has changed on Craigslist for a long time and according to some recent interviews, not much will change, as long as the market stays the same. </p>
<p>I will sum up and say- Whether your startup will benefit from funding or not would depend on your business model. But once you receive funding, success will hinge on effective utilization of resources and future strategy, which does not necessarily have to involve out of the box thinking:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish A</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-80909</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-80909</guid>
		<description>Well Said Ashish

Poor/unfunded will certainly learn a lot from their constant struggle with

limited resources, and If they could fetch value out of that would be 

more glorious.....

Haven’t you heard of Garage startups !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Said Ashish</p>
<p>Poor/unfunded will certainly learn a lot from their constant struggle with</p>
<p>limited resources, and If they could fetch value out of that would be </p>
<p>more glorious&#8230;..</p>
<p>Haven’t you heard of Garage startups !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohit</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-80908</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-80908</guid>
		<description>I have personally experienced this. Initially when I was starting out I needed huge money for content development for GIN Schools/Parents.

Since we didn&#039;t have it we were forced to explore partnerships with leading publishers, and we managed to get some. Also ended up developing system to aggregate educational content from the web. Not only it saved all that money (which we never had anyways) but more importantly several months of our time.

Resource constraints also make us think about alternate versions of  the product which can be made and sold faster. All this is probably overlooked if a lot of money is already available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have personally experienced this. Initially when I was starting out I needed huge money for content development for GIN Schools/Parents.</p>
<p>Since we didn&#8217;t have it we were forced to explore partnerships with leading publishers, and we managed to get some. Also ended up developing system to aggregate educational content from the web. Not only it saved all that money (which we never had anyways) but more importantly several months of our time.</p>
<p>Resource constraints also make us think about alternate versions of  the product which can be made and sold faster. All this is probably overlooked if a lot of money is already available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasad</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/entrepreneurship/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint-creativity-seed-1558/comment-page-1/#comment-80907</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/2008/05/difference-between-funded-and-unfunded-startups-resource-constraint#comment-80907</guid>
		<description>&quot;start adding bureaucratic positions&quot;: Best example is FriendSter: Key points of failure seems to be a disastrous in the initial architecture that just could not scale &amp; a succession of high profile but out of touch CEOs:
1]. Tim Koogle, 
2]. Scott Sassa, 
3]. Taek Kwan
They all  infighting at the executive level:mainly in betwn the VP Product and VP Engineering and a general level of arrogance at the board &amp; exec level.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/business/yourmoney/15friend.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Read Here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;start adding bureaucratic positions&#8221;: Best example is FriendSter: Key points of failure seems to be a disastrous in the initial architecture that just could not scale &amp; a succession of high profile but out of touch CEOs:<br />
1]. Tim Koogle,<br />
2]. Scott Sassa,<br />
3]. Taek Kwan<br />
They all  infighting at the executive level:mainly in betwn the VP Product and VP Engineering and a general level of arrogance at the board &amp; exec level.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/business/yourmoney/15friend.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow"> Read Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

