Easy Come, Easy Go [Startup Funding]

[Guest Article by Sanjay Anandaram. He shares his views on what easy money can do to your startup.]

The CEO naturally looked downcast as he pondered the imminent shutting down of his company which had a well known brand and enjoyed a reputation as a maker of high quality, well designed products. The management team seemed energetic and enthusiastic. Yet why had things had come to such a pass?

“I think we had too much easy money,” said the CEO. I asked him to explain what he meant. “When we started the company, the team, the concept, the business model and the market opportunity were all very attractive to investors who, flush with capital from freshly raised funds, were eager to make investments. Given this interest, we raised funds at a very attractive valuation in less than 45 days and without having to answer too many questions.
We believed we were unstoppable. We set up a great office in a not inexpensive part of town, created a very informal and casual culture with flexi-times, set up excellent infrastructure to enhance productivity and hired the best. It seemed like we were the darlings of the media as well. Our launch event was very well attended and our products were exceedingly well received – everyone appreciated the quality, the innovative design, the choices, the colours and our commitment to society. You see, we’d also promised to donate a certain percentage of our sales to the under-privileged. Soon we signed up distributors to sell our products as well.”

Then what happened?

“Well, the market started slowing down and we didn’t see it soon enough. We kept insisting that the market had yet to fully appreciate our products, business model and goals. That the market would soon learn to value high quality, top designs and the choices that were on offer. However, to keep sales ticking, we were forced to drop prices. To still keep making money with our cost structure, we convinced ourselves that we had to have higher volumes of sales. To achieve this, we had to go national – more distributors and retailers, more warehouses, more sales and support people, more procurement and manufacturing, more marketing, more investment in IT systems and the like. And of course, all this required more funds. We had no problem in raising this additional financing with no real questions being asked, yet again. Our story was so attractive! Board meetings were casual and friendly without too many questions being asked. I was essentially given a free hand.”

“But we hit a wall over the next 18 months. Actually, several walls. Our receivables position was becoming alarming as distributors and retailers were facing a credit crunch, our procurement costs were still very high, logistics and warehousing costs were not reducing, attrition in sales was increasing, only some designs were selling while we had a huge inventory of unsold designs, export orders had got rejected on account of damages in transit and some big retailers were very keen to renegotiate sales commissions and payment terms.
Our board was getting concerned since we were also running low on cash. Existing investors provided additional funds, this time as a loan to be converted into equity when we raised more money later. This time they asked more questions and ensured that the loan had certain covenants attached. Unfortunately, this money too proved too little as we were unable to successfully negotiate the changed market circumstances. Investors were very upset and refused to provide any more capital.

They were realizing how quickly the money had gone down the chute – they hadn’t bothered asking too many questions or trying to understand the costs, product, business model and pricing issues. We too were busy trying to build great products, designs and brand without worrying about fundamentals. There was too much money that came our way too easily. We didn’t have to work hard to justify our business plan. There was therefore no discipline and rigour. Investors were carried away as well with the team and plan and the promise.”

Easy come, easy go is an old saying. If something’s not been really earned but been almost handed over as an entitlement or a gift, its value tends to get undermined over time, sometimes very rapidly as in the above example. There are enough examples all around of all types of businesses that have lost their way because they came into too much money without being questioned and without having to really work hard in a disciplined and focused manner.

What do you think?

________________________________________________________________________
Sanjay Anandaram is a passionate advocate of entrepreneurship in India; He brings close to two decades of experience as an entrepreneur, corporate executive, venture investor, faculty member, advisor and mentor. He’s involved with Nasscom, TiE, IIM-Bangalore, and INSEAD business school in driving entrepreneurship. He can be reached at sanjay@jumpstartup.net. The views expressed here are his own.

 
  • Related Articles

    1. Weekly Recap – Twitter: Airtel Partnership, Startup Funding and more
    2. Collaborative Selling – Mantra for Sustaining Your Startup
    3. OnYeM – Managing Money Made Easy
    4. Weekly Recap of BraveHearts/Funding/Startup News..& more
    5. Startup Valuation – How much is my Startup Worth?
  • comment(s) on Easy Come, Easy Go [Startup Funding]

    10 Responses to Easy Come, Easy Go [Startup Funding]

    1. Karthik says:

      Sanjay,
      Interesting, there seems to be some problem all the time, either too little money or too much money! But isn’t this a case of “bad money”, money that comes with a VC attached who has no clue of the operations/industry/domain etc.? I would imagine entrepreneurs sometimes look at money-raising as a small victory in itself because it is a kind of a validation of the idea and the capabilities of the team; maybe it becomes even more important to seek funds from people who know how to build a business, or at least bring some domain or operating expertise?

    2. kunalkant says:

      Sanjay, Excellent write up
      Could you point single company in India who has gone this route. Its look impossible in today’s scenario as VC ask hell lot of question before and after investing in company and investment comes with strategic advice time to time. I am not able to understand it is possible in today’s environment. Guide me.
      -Kunalkant

    3. Mrigank says:

      I think 60% of the startups fail because they are not frugal or disciplined enough to try and get that extra mile out of the funds.

      We went the opposite route. Spent SGD 200K over the period of a year to build the product, get the customers, test the product etc, and then went back and told the investor – no more money for us till we are able to build our own cash flows. At Voicetap – we did that. I blogged about it here. http://bit.ly/a1EtSG

      I dont think we are still out of the woods – but we can see it on the horizon. If and when we do – I think the main reason would be the one stated in the blog post – simulating a kick in the b**ls!

      M

      • Resonator says:

        Expertly put, Mrigank. It’s not just about having a good idea, or even a good plan, but also about having the right attitude and financial wisdom. Even something like a narrow-market operation – like, say, Richard Easton’s matchmaking consultancy – requires some real finance and business experience. And it helped him when he changed fields, so to speak.

    4. Upasana says:

      Sanjay
      Great post; its hard to be critical of one’s mistakes. If I may ask when did you realize that the company was sinking because of this reason? Was it too late to course correct by then?

      Quite a few startups these days try hard to stay afloat bootstrapped to protect against the too easy syndrome. So my question is when is it too late to get money? As in, there is a point where startups have positive cashflow but need to raise money and take losses to scale, how to identify that point?

    5. Pingback: Technology By Day » Easy Come, Easy Go [Startup Funding]

    6. Niranjan says:

      Hi Sanjay
      Nice post. I feel it could happen to any company where the start up team is not guided well by the board. Most of the time Entreps don’t have the expertise in building companies, hence it becomes the responsibility of the board to guide them. Can’t expect the CEO and team to know it all but board should be atleast be “know more” situation.

    7. Kasi says:

      well narrated “start-up fiction” :-)

    8. Samir Kumar says:

      Great Article, Sanjay. Agree with the sentiments you’ve articulated.