<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox is the new IE, Chrome is the new Firefox and Opera is still Opera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/</link>
	<description>We Heart Startups!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-154324</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-154324</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t say that Firefox is that great for web development. Sure it has some nifty plugins and what-not, but the difference in how it renders pages compared to other browsers is a severe hindrance. I&#039;ve tested my site in the latest builds of Chromium, Safari, Opera and Firefox and they all render the pages identically except for Firefox. (IE hasn&#039;t been tested yet as I don&#039;t have it available anymore.) For example, none of the browsers I tested put borders on images inside links, but Firefox almost seemed excited to do it.

I remember back in the day when IE was the problem child in this regard, not Firefox. This is why I left it behind, along with the huge memory leaks and the fact that randomly it stopped loading pages, making my family think the Internet connection had dropped out. I think Firefox needs a complete overhaul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say that Firefox is that great for web development. Sure it has some nifty plugins and what-not, but the difference in how it renders pages compared to other browsers is a severe hindrance. I&#8217;ve tested my site in the latest builds of Chromium, Safari, Opera and Firefox and they all render the pages identically except for Firefox. (IE hasn&#8217;t been tested yet as I don&#8217;t have it available anymore.) For example, none of the browsers I tested put borders on images inside links, but Firefox almost seemed excited to do it.</p>
<p>I remember back in the day when IE was the problem child in this regard, not Firefox. This is why I left it behind, along with the huge memory leaks and the fact that randomly it stopped loading pages, making my family think the Internet connection had dropped out. I think Firefox needs a complete overhaul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ManishSinha</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-117234</link>
		<dc:creator>@ManishSinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-117234</guid>
		<description>Anand! Are you in senses? Seriously </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anand! Are you in senses? Seriously</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markavian</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-113014</link>
		<dc:creator>Markavian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-113014</guid>
		<description>Firefox, great for webdevelopment (plugins)
IE. Works, no problems. Helps if you have plugins disabled and don&#039;t install anything.
Chrome. Slow on googledocs, good for general browsing.
Opera, feels lightweight, quick to load, good to have in the background.

Why are people obsessed with plugins?
Installing more bloat and causing more problems. WEB BROWSING. VIEWING WEBPAGES. GOOD JAVASCRIPT SUPPORT. A move towards webapps running in their own tabs, not plugins hanging off the back off the browser. I think chrome have it right. Am I wrong?

I&#039;ll still be using all four of the major browsers for years to come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox, great for webdevelopment (plugins)<br />
IE. Works, no problems. Helps if you have plugins disabled and don&#8217;t install anything.<br />
Chrome. Slow on googledocs, good for general browsing.<br />
Opera, feels lightweight, quick to load, good to have in the background.</p>
<p>Why are people obsessed with plugins?<br />
Installing more bloat and causing more problems. WEB BROWSING. VIEWING WEBPAGES. GOOD JAVASCRIPT SUPPORT. A move towards webapps running in their own tabs, not plugins hanging off the back off the browser. I think chrome have it right. Am I wrong?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll still be using all four of the major browsers for years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurr</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-112994</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-112994</guid>
		<description>&quot;b) Chrome rendering engine is WebKit is the same as Safari, and Safari is much more feature complete and stable than Chrome.&quot;

You just said yourself you&#039;ve never used Chrome, so how can you even attempt to back this up? Being a Chrome user that at one point was given a Mac for work I can tell you that Chrome is far more &#039;complete and stable&#039; than Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;b) Chrome rendering engine is WebKit is the same as Safari, and Safari is much more feature complete and stable than Chrome.&#8221;</p>
<p>You just said yourself you&#8217;ve never used Chrome, so how can you even attempt to back this up? Being a Chrome user that at one point was given a Mac for work I can tell you that Chrome is far more &#8216;complete and stable&#8217; than Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raviraj Samant</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-112584</link>
		<dc:creator>Raviraj Samant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-112584</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is simply d best!

Opera doesnt provide better clarity pictures while usin internet 4m mobile thru PC suite.

The new upgrades dont let it crash evn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is simply d best!</p>
<p>Opera doesnt provide better clarity pictures while usin internet 4m mobile thru PC suite.</p>
<p>The new upgrades dont let it crash evn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neeraj joshi</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-111339</link>
		<dc:creator>Neeraj joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-111339</guid>
		<description>Personally , I am a big fan of Opera. it runs smooth and it runs fast too. Tabbed interface is great. It so easy and quick to enable/ disable javascript, delete private data and do other things. As far assimplicity is concerned. New Google chrome has also impressed a lot. Firefox i still getting bulky. I use it only for my web designing and development tasks. 
BTW Nice and Informative article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally , I am a big fan of Opera. it runs smooth and it runs fast too. Tabbed interface is great. It so easy and quick to enable/ disable javascript, delete private data and do other things. As far assimplicity is concerned. New Google chrome has also impressed a lot. Firefox i still getting bulky. I use it only for my web designing and development tasks.<br />
BTW Nice and Informative article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sud</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110825</link>
		<dc:creator>Sud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110825</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Ashish. I would like to test FF&#039;s experience with a &quot;typical&quot; set of plugins already installed, as that is what it is in the real world.

BTW, I have seen how strictly does Apple filter the apps for my iPhone. I wish FF had some such strict certification for its plugins, instead of risking loosing users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Ashish. I would like to test FF&#8217;s experience with a &#8220;typical&#8221; set of plugins already installed, as that is what it is in the real world.</p>
<p>BTW, I have seen how strictly does Apple filter the apps for my iPhone. I wish FF had some such strict certification for its plugins, instead of risking loosing users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshul</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110820</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110820</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t stop myself from writing this... :D

Opera comes with inbuilt functionality to do all the 4 things you mentioned. Right out of the box. No plugins, nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t stop myself from writing this&#8230; <img src='http://www.pluggd.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Opera comes with inbuilt functionality to do all the 4 things you mentioned. Right out of the box. No plugins, nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110814</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110814</guid>
		<description>For me, it&#039;s Firefox all the way.

Chrome may be a little faster, but, the little I lose in speed, I gain from having the web experience that I want, as follows :

* Adblock Plus - Ok, this is a given.
* Stylish - White sheet backgrounds that most websites seem to use give me migranes after a short while.  With Stylish, I can set the appearance to how *I* want it for websites that I use regularly.
* Greasemonkey - mainly for Facebook, for killing off those spammy quiz stories that clutter up my news feed.
* Noscript - Admittedly a pain in the ass for the first few days, but, ultimately, an extra level of safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it&#8217;s Firefox all the way.</p>
<p>Chrome may be a little faster, but, the little I lose in speed, I gain from having the web experience that I want, as follows :</p>
<p>* Adblock Plus &#8211; Ok, this is a given.<br />
* Stylish &#8211; White sheet backgrounds that most websites seem to use give me migranes after a short while.  With Stylish, I can set the appearance to how *I* want it for websites that I use regularly.<br />
* Greasemonkey &#8211; mainly for Facebook, for killing off those spammy quiz stories that clutter up my news feed.<br />
* Noscript &#8211; Admittedly a pain in the ass for the first few days, but, ultimately, an extra level of safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fonzie</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110802</link>
		<dc:creator>Fonzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110802</guid>
		<description>I use Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant Shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110766</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant Shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110766</guid>
		<description>can i please ask ashish to publish list of plugin&#039;s that he had been using while comparison took place.I hope that can clear out a lot of talk here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i please ask ashish to publish list of plugin&#8217;s that he had been using while comparison took place.I hope that can clear out a lot of talk here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant Shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110765</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant Shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110765</guid>
		<description>hey buddy, do you mean to say that FF should exercise control over which plugin to support and which not  talk about FF and not FF + plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey buddy, do you mean to say that FF should exercise control over which plugin to support and which not  talk about FF and not FF + plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant Shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110764</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant Shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110764</guid>
		<description>a point well narrated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a point well narrated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant Shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant Shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110763</guid>
		<description>I agree that memory leaks are for real and FF should do something about it.

But the point i was willing to raise was that in recent releases what they have done is that they create a random seed by scanning through your temp files and cache so startup gets a lot slow when you have large temp and cache</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that memory leaks are for real and FF should do something about it.</p>
<p>But the point i was willing to raise was that in recent releases what they have done is that they create a random seed by scanning through your temp files and cache so startup gets a lot slow when you have large temp and cache</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anuj Rathi</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110749</link>
		<dc:creator>Anuj Rathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110749</guid>
		<description>I clear the cache/browsing history/offline data/cookies, everything every half an hour or earlier(it&#039;s needed for developing-testing web apps), still doesn&#039;t do much to restore sanity to FF. Memory leaks are for real :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I clear the cache/browsing history/offline data/cookies, everything every half an hour or earlier(it&#8217;s needed for developing-testing web apps), still doesn&#8217;t do much to restore sanity to FF. Memory leaks are for real <img src='http://www.pluggd.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anuj Rathi</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110748</link>
		<dc:creator>Anuj Rathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110748</guid>
		<description>The end user should definitely care about the open source story! 
If a product is open source (say FireFox), and if I think something needs to be done to get an additional functionality, there are two advantages of it being open source:
a) A lot of developers, worldwide would have the same issue, and would be already working on that
b) I can &quot;request feature&quot; online and wait for some months till someone add those :)
c) I can develop the feature myself and release it(okay, if you&#039;re not into dev, that&#039;s not an option)

But for proprietary products(say IE), I have to depend on the product managers of M$, and if you think your request is going to be granted there... dream on!

Chrome, by the way, is also made open source by google. Although I don&#039;t like it as much as Firefox, and although it&#039;s not yet available for the mac,  I do check it&#039;s status by downloading the nightly builds once a fortnight to know what exactly I&#039;m going to get when it&#039;s released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end user should definitely care about the open source story!<br />
If a product is open source (say FireFox), and if I think something needs to be done to get an additional functionality, there are two advantages of it being open source:<br />
a) A lot of developers, worldwide would have the same issue, and would be already working on that<br />
b) I can &#8220;request feature&#8221; online and wait for some months till someone add those <img src='http://www.pluggd.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
c) I can develop the feature myself and release it(okay, if you&#8217;re not into dev, that&#8217;s not an option)</p>
<p>But for proprietary products(say IE), I have to depend on the product managers of M$, and if you think your request is going to be granted there&#8230; dream on!</p>
<p>Chrome, by the way, is also made open source by google. Although I don&#8217;t like it as much as Firefox, and although it&#8217;s not yet available for the mac,  I do check it&#8217;s status by downloading the nightly builds once a fortnight to know what exactly I&#8217;m going to get when it&#8217;s released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshul</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110745</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110745</guid>
		<description>Firefox is Cool, (with Firebug of course)
Opera is Super Cool... :)

Apart from the inbuilt mail client, RSS reader and speed dial there are million little things done right by Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is Cool, (with Firebug of course)<br />
Opera is Super Cool&#8230; <img src='http://www.pluggd.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Apart from the inbuilt mail client, RSS reader and speed dial there are million little things done right by Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhisek</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110744</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhisek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 01:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110744</guid>
		<description>are you nuts? IE6 the best? ROFLMAO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you nuts? IE6 the best? ROFLMAO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suhas</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110739</link>
		<dc:creator>suhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110739</guid>
		<description>well...to me its a product comparison and not feature comparison..this is author&#039;s personal experience..whch incidentally is a reflection of most of us.
If FF isn&#039;t going to listen to such feedback,they will end up like IE. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230;to me its a product comparison and not feature comparison..this is author&#8217;s personal experience..whch incidentally is a reflection of most of us.<br />
If FF isn&#8217;t going to listen to such feedback,they will end up like IE. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rubygems</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110738</link>
		<dc:creator>rubygems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110738</guid>
		<description>a) good point--the one reason I like FF (though don&#039;t use it--it starts slower than chrome, which is enough for me to always prefer chrome).

b) Chrome does have right click &quot;inspect element&quot; except that you&#039;d of course want to use IE and FF for that, if you&#039;re a web developer, so no huge gain there.

c) chrome 3 has greasemonkey.

That being said, FF 3.5 seems a lot snappier than its predecessors and, if nothing else, competition from chrome will push it to become better.  Everone gains.
GL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a) good point&#8211;the one reason I like FF (though don&#8217;t use it&#8211;it starts slower than chrome, which is enough for me to always prefer chrome).</p>
<p>b) Chrome does have right click &#8220;inspect element&#8221; except that you&#8217;d of course want to use IE and FF for that, if you&#8217;re a web developer, so no huge gain there.</p>
<p>c) chrome 3 has greasemonkey.</p>
<p>That being said, FF 3.5 seems a lot snappier than its predecessors and, if nothing else, competition from chrome will push it to become better.  Everone gains.<br />
GL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110737</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110737</guid>
		<description>And ya just one simple tip try clearing out you cache periodicaly that will help you keep ff running as well as save precious disk space</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And ya just one simple tip try clearing out you cache periodicaly that will help you keep ff running as well as save precious disk space</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110736</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110736</guid>
		<description>Suhas no one is trying to be geek here the point is as simple as that he you are comparing two products and claiming one to be slow then atleast comparision should be equal. And ya just stating that ff is bloated even without plugin&#039;s wont do if you state it then prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suhas no one is trying to be geek here the point is as simple as that he you are comparing two products and claiming one to be slow then atleast comparision should be equal. And ya just stating that ff is bloated even without plugin&#8217;s wont do if you state it then prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suhas</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110731</link>
		<dc:creator>Suhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110731</guid>
		<description>Geeks will be geeks - how does &#039;open source&#039; etc matters? To me, the end product&#039;s utlity is broken if the prod is broken.
I agree - FF is losing out in terms of performance - its way too bloated now..even w/o major plugins, its boot time is screwed up.

Geeks - tell me one thing, why should the end user care about open source story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeks will be geeks &#8211; how does &#8216;open source&#8217; etc matters? To me, the end product&#8217;s utlity is broken if the prod is broken.<br />
I agree &#8211; FF is losing out in terms of performance &#8211; its way too bloated now..even w/o major plugins, its boot time is screwed up.</p>
<p>Geeks &#8211; tell me one thing, why should the end user care about open source story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant Shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110729</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant Shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110729</guid>
		<description>One more point that i missed, although i agree that certain control should be there but then just have a look at this scenario 

for me firebug is something i can&#039;t dream of living where as for a large group this would be a piece of shit and something that should not have been released in public as it just bloat&#039;s there browser.

on one side of this single sentence is me ready to sacrifice on speed for actually performance and on other side is a person who find no use of the plugin.

so we can&#039;t restrict on development 

on a lighter side
there is one example i can think on in this case and that is proprietary soft solution &quot;don&#039;t let other&#039;s touch the code and in that way you can exercise control&quot; but not in Open Source Model</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more point that i missed, although i agree that certain control should be there but then just have a look at this scenario </p>
<p>for me firebug is something i can&#8217;t dream of living where as for a large group this would be a piece of shit and something that should not have been released in public as it just bloat&#8217;s there browser.</p>
<p>on one side of this single sentence is me ready to sacrifice on speed for actually performance and on other side is a person who find no use of the plugin.</p>
<p>so we can&#8217;t restrict on development </p>
<p>on a lighter side<br />
there is one example i can think on in this case and that is proprietary soft solution &#8220;don&#8217;t let other&#8217;s touch the code and in that way you can exercise control&#8221; but not in Open Source Model</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant shrivastava</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110725</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant shrivastava</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110725</guid>
		<description>Agreed that being opensource also has a responsibility to keep things stable but in that case also no one is suggesting you to install every damn plugin that comes on earth. Developers create plugin for their own need and distribute it so that other dont have to work again. So what i suggest is instead of blaming any software for its bloatedness lets have a comparision with all browsers at equal level also . And ya one more thing if my tone seems a bit harsh pardon of it i am typing this while travelling so not able to review my comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that being opensource also has a responsibility to keep things stable but in that case also no one is suggesting you to install every damn plugin that comes on earth. Developers create plugin for their own need and distribute it so that other dont have to work again. So what i suggest is instead of blaming any software for its bloatedness lets have a comparision with all browsers at equal level also . And ya one more thing if my tone seems a bit harsh pardon of it i am typing this while travelling so not able to review my comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashish</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110723</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110723</guid>
		<description>Since some of you are saying - lets do a plugin free FF comparison with Chrome, let me tell you this - the post/review is a user review. If you give users a lot of fluff to play with, users will play with them.

That&#039;s the challenge of being an open platform, but wht one needs to do is have a strict control/constraint, otherwise you will have great applications,but that will make the platform bloated and useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since some of you are saying &#8211; lets do a plugin free FF comparison with Chrome, let me tell you this &#8211; the post/review is a user review. If you give users a lot of fluff to play with, users will play with them.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the challenge of being an open platform, but wht one needs to do is have a strict control/constraint, otherwise you will have great applications,but that will make the platform bloated and useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saurabh Chawdhary</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110721</link>
		<dc:creator>Saurabh Chawdhary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110721</guid>
		<description>IE 6 best browser?? Dude come out of stone age. Apart from all the mistakes u pointed out its a primitive browser(lacks tabbed browsing and much more).

BTW has anybody tried Opera 10 beta 2 version. It is the most advanced form of browsing. Highly customizable (u&#039;ll need to spend time to discover ur power to change), inbuilt mail client which is no less than if not better than thunderbird.

It fixes the memory leak thing to some extent without multiple process(and connections too) making as in chrome(which is why I dont use chrome). And if u look at its mem-usage in as browser+mail client its way beyond efficient.
It&#039;s pretty stable too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE 6 best browser?? Dude come out of stone age. Apart from all the mistakes u pointed out its a primitive browser(lacks tabbed browsing and much more).</p>
<p>BTW has anybody tried Opera 10 beta 2 version. It is the most advanced form of browsing. Highly customizable (u&#8217;ll need to spend time to discover ur power to change), inbuilt mail client which is no less than if not better than thunderbird.</p>
<p>It fixes the memory leak thing to some extent without multiple process(and connections too) making as in chrome(which is why I dont use chrome). And if u look at its mem-usage in as browser+mail client its way beyond efficient.<br />
It&#8217;s pretty stable too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anuj Rathi</title>
		<link>http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/comment-page-1/#comment-110719</link>
		<dc:creator>Anuj Rathi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pluggd.in/chrome-faster-than-firefox-297/#comment-110719</guid>
		<description>a) They can help you do away with ads. I haven&#039;t seen even 1 ad after I&#039;ve instaled Ad block plus extension on firefox

b) They help you develop websites like no other browser can! Firebug/Live HTTP headers/Venkman are all life savers for a web dev.

c) You have to try greasemonkey to understand what you can do to your default facebook/orkut pages. :D

Point is: It&#039;s awesome for power users, just that you have to keep on restarting your browser after 4-5 hours of use. (FF runs like a dog after 4-5 hours even on my 4gb DD3 RAM machine ) Also, avoid firebug intercept all your requests to ajax heavy sites like gmail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a) They can help you do away with ads. I haven&#8217;t seen even 1 ad after I&#8217;ve instaled Ad block plus extension on firefox</p>
<p>b) They help you develop websites like no other browser can! Firebug/Live HTTP headers/Venkman are all life savers for a web dev.</p>
<p>c) You have to try greasemonkey to understand what you can do to your default facebook/orkut pages. <img src='http://www.pluggd.in/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Point is: It&#8217;s awesome for power users, just that you have to keep on restarting your browser after 4-5 hours of use. (FF runs like a dog after 4-5 hours even on my 4gb DD3 RAM machine ) Also, avoid firebug intercept all your requests to ajax heavy sites like gmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

